Last week
I'd asked you bloginistas out there to hit me with some questions, to serve
as future subject matter. Several of you responded with some excellent ones.
Oddly enough, a fellow professional was the first one to toss some my way
(and the questions weren't "Do you know who's hiring?"). Thanks
much, gang, you've helped me through the next two months with your inquiries.
Q: Whose work within the comic medium
have you grown to appreciate and respect most, after some initial disinterest
or dislike?
This took me a few hours to mull over, and then it hit
me as I passed my spinner rack full of old '70's comics:
A: The late Frank Robbins.
As a wee lad, I was first introduced to Frank Robbins
when he took over Captain America from Sal Buscema (Cap #182, "Inferno!").
My cousin Sean & I HATED his art immediately because
1) He WASN'T Sal Buscema. Sal had drawn Cap for years
and change is scary!
2) Robbins, trying to adapt to the Marvel exaggerated
action style, drew oddly contorting figures and maniacal faces that were
anathema to:
3) Our fanboy tastes, which were accustomed to Marvel's
then-in-house style of the time: The Buscema brothers, Romita, Sinnott,
Gil Kane, superior craftsman all.
Rambling Sidebar: Kane's hyperkinetic covers were the
best marketing tool of ANY era- I bought a lot of crappy comics because
Kane's dynanicism seemed to promise that similar excitement awaited inside.
Best example: Avengers #133, where Libra's taking off his mask as the other
Avengers, in spring-loaded poses, gaped in awe! Inside the pages was this
long confusing history lesson involving the Kree killing their plant-form
neighbors which was tied to the origin of Mantis (who started out cool,
then got less interesting the more we learned of her). I have NEVER found
the Kree fascinating as a race. Their motives are always so vague or overreaching
to the point of, well, pointlessness. Bear in mind, when this story, dubbed
"The Celestial Madonna" was released in trade paperback a few
years ago, I was the first one ready with my wallet! Nostalgia's a forgiving
mistress.
See, Robbins wasn't a superhero artist, he was a cartoonist!
When he came to Marvel, the gold standard was, of all people, Rich Buckler,
doing his wholesale Neal Adams and Kirby swipes.
Apparently Sean and I weren't alone in our vocal disapproval
of Robbins. Back then, letters pages were downright nasty! Jack Kirby believed
the letters pages of his books were unfairly loaded with knocks against
him. Jack was just one of many creators criticized at the time! Need a taste?
Strap yourselves in, True dis-Believers!
"Dear Marvel,
Whohhh, what a jolt! I'm talking about what CA #182 did to me. Boy, the
Bullpen's really falling apart. I'm talking about the new crew that worked
on "Inferno!" That Frank Robbins just doesn't make it on my list
as Bullpen potential. Send him back to his Johnny Hazard strip, and let
him back in Marveldom when he's up to par. Look at page two, frame four.
Cap looks like some scared kid. Page 3, frame 2, the Cobras' legs look to
be all mangled. Dave Cox looks like a jerk. All through the story, the Cobra
looked like bawl baby and the Viper looked super-crazy, especially on page
15, frame 5. The dots in Cap's eyes made him look dumb. Roscoe and the Falcon
looked like a couple of looney-tooners. The Red Skull doesn't look anything
like he should. The people just don't look true to life.
Get the point!!!"
I'm withholding the letter-writer's name, as this was
thirty years ago, and the statute of limitations is probably over on such
a carpet-bombing of insults. Here's a sample from another letter:
"Dear Anybody,
HELP!
It is hard to say how bad CA&F #182 was. The only good picture was the
trademark. Captain America is my favorite comic, but the art in this issue
looks like it was drawn by a six-year-old riding a rough train during 1938..."
And there were worse ones, believe me! I just choose not
to post them here.
During his year-long run on Cap (with constantly-changing
inkers giving Robbins' art an unsteady and unsatisfying look), he launched
with Roy Thomas...The Invaders!
I was hooked from the first issue because it featured
Cap's exploits during WWII. Plus, lo and behold-a kid sidekick named Bucky?
Two Human Torches, neither of whom were Johnny Storm? That obnoxious Sub-Mariner
guy who's always annoying the FF? By the way, Giant-sized Invaders #1 was
released the same month as Giant-sized X-men #1, and they have always held
an equally special place in my heart.
At the beginning of GS Invaders #1, there was a credit
box which read: "With Special Thanks To John Romita". Skimming
though the issue now, I easily can see the Romita touches on the faces and
figures, to probably make them more 'on model'. Also, inks by the legendary
love-him-or-hate-him Vinnie Colletta, also served to tone down Robbins'
bold style to something more, I dunno, industry standard, I suppose. I'm
not questioning Romita's judgement, as he helped define Marvel's look in
the 1970's, and probably made the first Invaders issues more palatable to
we Robbins-bashers, and it worked, IMHO. Check out the page 18 of # 3, shown
here. I apologize for the poor quality of the art, but it's a photocopy
of a color comic on aging newsprint, but if you click on it, it'll make
it a tad larger and clearer. |